Latest news with #Afghan relocation
BBC News
4 days ago
- Politics
- BBC News
UK offered to speed up resettlement case of Afghan who posted leaked data online
The Ministry of Defence offered to expedite the review of a rejected resettlement application of an Afghan national after he posted sensitive details from a data breach on Facebook, the BBC man published nine names from a dataset containing details of thousands of Afghans who applied to be relocated to the UK after the Taliban seized power, and indicated he could release the obtained the details after they were sent out from UK Special Forces headquarters in an accidental data breach in February 2022. British authorities tracked the man down and strongly requested he take the data down, offering an expedited review of his rejected resettlement application in return. The BBC understands the man is now in the UK, having had his rejected application overturned. He is not believed to be facing any criminal charges in relation to his sources close to the process told the BBC the individual had essentially blackmailed his way into the country using the leaked asked about the actions of the individual and his subsequent relocation to the UK, the MoD declined to comment on the case.A spokesperson said "anyone who comes to the UK under any Afghan relocation schemes" must go through "robust security checks in order to gain entry". The BBC has also approached the Met Police for Mercer, the former veterans minister, who was covered by the super-injunction because of his knowledge of the events, told the BBC the breach was representative of the "chaos" around the relocation process, and the individual brought to the UK had used the data to get in."He put the names on Facebook and essentially bribed the MoD to get in the country. The Ministry of Defence offered to expedite his case and next thing you know he's in the UK," Mercer said."There were multiple data leaks from the MoD regarding these applications. I think that gives you some sense of the chaos and lack of care in how things were being run at that time."The breach occurred in February 2022 after someone working in UK Special Forces (UKSF) headquarters accidentally emailed the personal data of every applicant to the UK's Afghan resettlement scheme to date – nearly 19,000 people – to someone outside data was sent to an Afghan person living in the UK, who passed the information onto others, including people in Afghanistan. One individual in Afghanistan, after having his application rejected, posted some of the data on a defence minister to the presence of the data on Facebook in August 2023, an MoD case worker helping people seeking relocation called the possibility the Taliban might get hold of it "bone-chilling".The data came from the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) resettlement scheme, set up in 2021 as the Taliban seized control of was highly sensitive because Afghan nationals who worked with the British government during the conflict with the Taliban were at risk of serious harm and even execution with the group back in breach led to the previous government setting up a secret £850m emergency resettlement scheme to bring some of those in the database to the the breach and subsequent scheme were kept secret by an unprecedented super-injunction, until it was lifted by High Court judge Mr Justice Chamberlain on emergency scheme – known as the Afghanistan Response Route and set up in April 2024 – has resulted in about 4,500 Afghans being brought to the UK so far, with a further 2,400 government announced this week the scheme was being closed down, but said relocation offers already made to those who remain in Afghanistan would be honoured. Special forces veto had role in breach The UKSF official who inadvertently leaked the data was assisting with the verification of a small number of applications from Afghan special forces when the accidental breach official was in possession of the full dataset because UKSF – the umbrella group containing the SAS and SBS – was given a secret veto over Arap applications from former members of Afghan special BBC revealed last year that UKSF had used that veto to block hundreds of Afghan commandos who had fought alongside the SAS and SBS from relocating to the obtained by Panorama showed special forces had rejected applications despite some containing compelling evidence of service alongside the SAS on dangerous night raid personal information of many of those Afghan special forces were included in the massive data breach revealed this sources told the BBC they were sidelined in the emergency evacuation process and their cases were essentially paused, while case workers were instructed to prioritise people who had worked on British military bases for urgent Street refused to say on Tuesday whether the UKSF official who accidentally leaked the data had faced disciplinary action. The BBC has confirmed he is no longer in the post he occupied at the time of the MoD refused to comment on how many applicants affected by the breach had been harmed by the Taliban in the years since it happened. It said some of those whose data was compromised by the breach were not informed until after the lifting of the super-injunction. Defence Secretary John Healey told the BBC on Wednesday he was "unable to say for sure" that no Afghans were killed as a result of the data breach, and the Taliban would "almost certainly" have held the same type of in the Commons on Tuesday, he offered a "sincere apology" to those whose details had been included in the breach, which he described as a "serious departmental error" and a "clear breach of strict data protection protocols".Healey told MPs an independent review had found it was "highly unlikely" an individual would have been targeted solely because of the a 2024 High Court judgement made public on Tuesday, Mr Justice Chamberlain said it was "quite possible" that some of those who saw parts of the leaked document in a Facebook group "were Taliban infiltrators or spoke about it to Taliban-aligned individuals".Erin Alcock, a lawyer for the firm Leigh Day, which has assisted hundreds of Arap applicants including dozens of former Afghan commandos, said the breach represented a "catastrophic failure" of the government to "protect the personal information, and therefore the safety, of what is an extremely vulnerable group of individuals". Do you have information about this story that you want to share?Get in touch using SecureDrop, a highly anonymous and secure way of whistleblowing to the BBC which uses the TOR by using the Signal messaging app, an end-to-end encrypted message service designed to protect your or Signal: 0044 7714 956 936Please note that the SecureDrop link will only work in a Tor browser. For information on keeping secure and anonymous, here's some advice on how to use proved a really important way for people to get in touch with us in the past.
Irish Times
5 days ago
- Politics
- Irish Times
UK set up secret Afghan immigration scheme after data leak
The UK government set up a secret multibillion-pound scheme to relocate thousands of Afghans to Britain after a data leak put them at risk of reprisals from the Taliban – and gagged the media with a super-injunction. The names, contact information and other personal details of about 25,000 Afghans, people who worked closely with the UK before the Taliban seized power and some of their family members, were accidentally disclosed by a British soldier in emails in February 2022. The leak of the vast, highly sensitive database was not discovered until August 2023 when it was mentioned in a Facebook group. About 100,000 people were put at risk, the government estimated, when wider family members were included. It also contained email addresses belonging to UK government officials. In response, ministers in Rishi Sunak's former Conservative government instituted a secret scheme to bring Afghans to the UK. READ MORE [ International Criminal Court issues arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over persecution of women Opens in new window ] The plan as recently as February this year, under Keir Starmer's current Labour administration, was to relocate 25,000 people, at a potential cost of £7 billion (€8 billion), according to a government estimate. 'The current policy response to the [data] incident will mean relocating circa 25,000 Afghans, who have previously been found ineligible for the [Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy] scheme, but who we assess to be at the highest risk of targeting by the Taliban should they have access to the database. This will mean relocating more Afghans to the UK than have been relocated under the ARAP scheme, at time when the UK's immigration and asylum system is under significant strain. This will extend the scheme for another 5 years at a cost of [about] £7 billion. Implementation of the policy has also required unprecedented legal action, in the form of the 'super injunction' that has consequences for scrutiny and transparency.' In recent weeks, as the High Court in London took steps towards lifting the veil on the affair, the government cut short the scheme. British intelligence had previously assessed that the breach had put the Afghans at risk of murder, torture, harassment and intimidation by the Taliban. The UK's ministry of defence said this month that a new review of threats in Afghanistan had found the risk to Afghans still in the country was less than previously thought. Despite the £7 billion estimate revealed in court proceedings, MoD officials said this week that the direct costs of the leak had only ever been estimated at about £2 billion (€2.3 billion), and that the bill for the covert evacuations would now be much lower because the number of eligible Afghans had been reduced. The revelations come at a time when Britain's public finances are under heavy strain and the anti-immigration Reform UK opposition party is leading the country's main establishment parties in the polls. The High Court has been told that civil servants have warned of the risk of 'public disorder' in reaction to news of the secret relocation plan, which comes a year after far-right riots last summer. To date, the UK government has moved about 18,500 Afghans affected by the data breach to Britain. The MoD said most were already eligible under an existing route. Officials said just 5,500 people were relocated directly because of the breach, with at least a further 2,400 due to come. Defence secretary John Healey is expected to announce he is closing the secret scheme – known as the Afghan Response Route – to new applicants in a statement to the House of Commons on Tuesday. Earlier this month, the government also abruptly closed the public schemes – known as the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) and Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme. The events can be reported for the first time after the UK's high court on Tuesday lifted an unparalleled global gagging order that has silenced the press since September 2023. The super-injunction was the first ever to be obtained by the British government. But a fresh interim injunction granted by the High Court until at least next week means that even now crucial details that explain the severity of the incident cannot be published. The database was a detailed record of individuals who had applied – in most cases unsuccessfully – under the public Arap scheme, which offered relocation to the UK for those at risk of reprisals after they worked for or alongside the UK before the Taliban retook power. UK combat operations ended in Afghanistan in 2014 after 13 years, but British troops remained until a chaotic western withdrawal in 2021 that allowed the Taliban's return. The UK government did not discover the leak until an anonymous person posted screenshots of the spreadsheet on Facebook in August 2023 and threatened to disclose the entire database. One of the people familiar with the breach said the database had been sold, at least once, for a five-figure sum. They said that one of the Afghan recipients used their possession of the database as leverage to pressure the government to relocate themselves and 14 family members to the UK. The identity of the soldier, or whether they have been sanctioned, has not been revealed by the MoD. The department has not successfully contained the leak and it is not known whether the Taliban has obtained the list. More than 665 Afghans have started a collective legal action to sue the MoD over the data breach, seeking at least £50,000 each (€57,600), with the potential for thousands more people to join the lawsuit once they learn of the incident and their potential exposure. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025.
BreakingNews.ie
5 days ago
- Politics
- BreakingNews.ie
Thousands being relocated to UK after personal data leak of Afghans
Thousands of people are being relocated to the UK as part of a secret £850 million scheme set up after a personal data leak of Afghans who supported British forces, it can now be reported. A dataset containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official. Advertisement The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024. The scheme is understood to have cost around £400 million so far, with a projected cost once completed of around £850 million. Millions more is expected to be paid in legal costs and compensation. The UK ministry of defence (MoD) only became aware of the breach over a year after the release, when excerpts of the dataset were anonymously posted onto a Facebook group in August 2023. Advertisement Details on the dataset include the the names and contact details of the Arap applicants and names of their family members. Arap was responsible for relocating Afghan nationals who had worked for or with the UK government and were therefore at risk of reprisals once the Taliban returned to power in Kabul in 2021. Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024. However an independent review, commissioned by the UK government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'. Advertisement Around 4,500 people – made up of 900 Arap applicants and approximately 3,600 family members have been brought to the UK or are in transit so far through the Afghanistan Response Route. A further estimated 600 people and their relatives are expected to be relocated before the scheme closes, with a total of around 6,900 people expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. Projected costs of the scheme may include relocation costs, transitional accommodation, legal costs and local authority tariffs. It is understood that the unnamed official had emailed the dataset outside of a secure government system while attempting to verify information, believing the dataset to only have around 150 rows. Advertisement However, there were more than 33,000 rows of information which were inadvertently sent. An unprecedented superinjunction was made at the High Court in September 2023 to reduce the risk of alerting the Taliban to the existence of the data, with the decision to apply for an order made by then-defence secretary Ben Wallace. The Information Commissioner's Office and Metropolitan Police were also informed. The superinjunction, lifted on Tuesday, is thought to be the longest lasting order of its kind and the first time the Government has sought such a restrictive measure against the media. Advertisement At multiple hearings, lawyers for the MoD said in written submissions that there was a 'very real risk that people who would otherwise live will die' if the Taliban gained access to the data. However, a recent report by retired civil servant Paul Rimmer said: 'Given the data they already have access to as the de facto government, we believe it is unlikely the dataset would be the single, or definitive, piece of information enabling or prompting the Taliban to act.' Mr Rimmer further found that the Government possibly 'inadvertently added more value to the dataset' by seeking the unprecedented superinjunction and creating a bespoke resettlement scheme. Under plans set out last October, the Afghanistan Response Route was expected to allow up to 25,000 people – most of whom were ineligible for Arap but deemed to be at the highest risk from Taliban reprisals – to be relocated. One internal Government document from February this year said: 'This will mean relocating more Afghans to the UK than have been relocated under the Arap scheme, at a time when the UK's immigration and asylum system is under significant strain. This will extend the scheme for another five years at a cost of c. £7 billion.' This figure is understood to be a previous estimate of the cost of all Afghan relocations, with projected costs now between £5.5 billion and £6 billion. The resettlement schemes are closing, with the review suggesting that the Afghanistan Response Route may be 'disproportionate' to the impact of the Taliban obtaining the information. As of March 2025, around 36,000 people had been relocated to the UK under Arap and other resettlement schemes. Arap, which was launched in April 2021, is now closed to new applicants after immigration rule changes were laid in Parliament earlier this month. The Government had originally outlined plans to launch a compensation scheme for those affected by the breach, with an estimated cost of between £120 and £350 million, not including administration expenses. Hundreds of data protection legal challenges are also expected, with the court previously told that a Manchester-based law firm already had several hundred prospective clients. A High Court judge lifted the superinjunction. Photo: PA. The breach can now be reported after a High Court judge lifted the superinjunction – which prohibited making any reference to the existence of the court proceedings and is thought to have been the longest and widest ranging of its kind – on Tuesday. In one of several rulings, judge Mr Justice Chamberlain noted the superinjunction 'imposed very wide-ranging restrictions', with information about the breach limited to selected officials. In a decision in November 2023, Mr Justice Chamberlain said while the superinjunction did not constrain what could be said in Parliament, 'MPs and peers cannot ask questions about something they do not know about'. The judge ruled in May 2024 that the order should be lifted, stating there was a 'significant possibility' the Taliban knew about the dataset, adding it was 'fundamentally objectionable' that decisions about thousands of people's lives and 'enormous sums of public money now being committed' were being taken in secret. However, judges at the Court of Appeal overturned this ruling the following month, finding that he had not properly considered the consequences of lifting the order and that the superinjunction should stay in place. Following the retired civil servant's review, the MoD agreed on July 4 that the order could be lifted. It is expected that the cost of seeking and maintaining the superinjunction will be several million pounds. Reading a summary of his judgment in court on Tuesday, Mr Justice Chamberlain noted that the grant of the superinjunction had 'given rise to serious free speech concerns'. He added: 'The superinjunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability which operate in a democracy. 'This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum'.'
The Independent
5 days ago
- Politics
- The Independent
Thousands being relocated to UK after personal data leak of Afghans
Thousands of people are being relocated to the UK as part of a secret £850 million scheme set up after a personal data leak of Afghans who supported British forces, it can now be reported. A dataset containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official. The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024. The scheme is understood to have cost around £400 million so far, with a projected cost once completed of around £850 million. Millions more is expected to be paid in legal costs and compensation. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) only became aware of the breach over a year after the release, when excerpts of the dataset were anonymously posted onto a Facebook group in August 2023. Details on the dataset include the the names and contact details of the Arap applicants and names of their family members. Arap was responsible for relocating Afghan nationals who had worked for or with the UK Government and were therefore at risk of reprisals once the Taliban returned to power in Kabul in 2021. Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024. However an independent review, commissioned by the Government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'. Around 4,500 people – made up of 900 Arap applicants and approximately 3,600 family members have been brought to the UK or are in transit so far through the Afghanistan Response Route. A further estimated 600 people and their relatives are expected to be relocated before the scheme closes, with a total of around 6,900 people expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. Projected costs of the scheme may include relocation costs, transitional accommodation, legal costs and local authority tariffs. It is understood that the unnamed official had emailed the dataset outside of a secure government system while attempting to verify information, believing the dataset to only have around 150 rows. However, there were more than 33,000 rows of information which were inadvertently sent. An unprecedented superinjunction was made at the High Court in September 2023 to reduce the risk of alerting the Taliban to the existence of the data, with the decision to apply for an order made by then-defence secretary Ben Wallace. The Information Commissioner's Office and Metropolitan Police were also informed. The superinjunction, lifted on Tuesday, is thought to be the longest lasting order of its kind and the first time the Government has sought such a restrictive measure against the media. At multiple hearings, lawyers for the MoD said in written submissions that there was a 'very real risk that people who would otherwise live will die' if the Taliban gained access to the data. However, a recent report by retired civil servant Paul Rimmer said: 'Given the data they already have access to as the de facto government, we believe it is unlikely the dataset would be the single, or definitive, piece of information enabling or prompting the Taliban to act.' Mr Rimmer further found that the Government possibly 'inadvertently added more value to the dataset' by seeking the unprecedented superinjunction and creating a bespoke resettlement scheme. Under plans set out last October, the Afghanistan Response Route was expected to allow up to 25,000 people – most of whom were ineligible for Arap but deemed to be at the highest risk from Taliban reprisals – to be relocated. One internal Government document from February this year said: 'This will mean relocating more Afghans to the UK than have been relocated under the Arap scheme, at a time when the UK's immigration and asylum system is under significant strain. This will extend the scheme for another five years at a cost of c. £7 billion.' However, the resettlement schemes are closing, with the review suggesting that the Afghanistan Response Route may be 'disproportionate' to the impact of the Taliban obtaining the information. As of March 2025, around 36,000 people had been relocated to the UK under Arap and other resettlement schemes. Arap, which was launched in April 2021, is now closed to new applicants after immigration rule changes were laid in Parliament earlier this month. The Government had originally outlined plans to launch a compensation scheme for those affected by the breach, with an estimated cost of between £120 and £350 million, not including administration expenses. Hundreds of data protection legal challenges are also expected, with the court previously told that a Manchester-based law firm already had several hundred prospective clients. The breach can now be reported after a High Court judge lifted the superinjunction – which prohibited making any reference to the existence of the court proceedings and is thought to have been the longest and widest ranging of its kind – on Tuesday. In one of several rulings, judge Mr Justice Chamberlain noted the superinjunction 'imposed very wide-ranging restrictions', with information about the breach limited to selected officials. In a decision in November 2023, Mr Justice Chamberlain said while the superinjunction did not constrain what could be said in Parliament, 'MPs and peers cannot ask questions about something they do not know about'. The judge ruled in May 2024 that the order should be lifted, stating there was a 'significant possibility' the Taliban knew about the dataset, adding it was 'fundamentally objectionable' that decisions about thousands of people's lives and 'enormous sums of public money now being committed' were being taken in secret. However, judges at the Court of Appeal overturned this ruling the following month, finding that he had not properly considered the consequences of lifting the order and that the superinjunction should stay in place. Following the retired civil servant's review, the MoD agreed on July 4 that the order could be lifted. It is expected that the cost of seeking and maintaining the superinjunction will be several million pounds.
